What's the best evidence for this claim: Humans are unable to not be biased in judgments, even when monetarily motivated to get it right. Though humans vary in strength of their bias, it's not possible to remove entirely except by balancing it with countervailing bias.
-
Show this thread
@ImHardcory @PsychRabble @EPoe187 @BenWinegard Sounds like something up your alley.
If this claim is true, seems the most plausible way to avoid pol bias in peer review, is to 1) balance reviewers by pol, 2) results blind, 3) large power only, 4) pre-reg methods.
More?
3:24 PM - 23 Nov 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.