@ImHardcory @PsychRabble @EPoe187 @BenWinegard Sounds like something up your alley.
If this claim is true, seems the most plausible way to avoid pol bias in peer review, is to 1) balance reviewers by pol, 2) results blind, 3) large power only, 4) pre-reg methods.
More?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Were you asking for a real world example? How about successful hedge fund managers getting wiped out by the market?
-
No, I am asking for a list of studies with randomization and monetary rewards or something like that.
-
Ok, you may want to look at the literature on decision making under risk, beginning with Tversky and Kahneman's "Propect Theory". You also might do well to look through the cognitive psychology lit. on biases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias …
-
Psychology is a minefield for lack of replicability, but I believe cognitive psych is the least terrible offender.
-
You don't seem to understand what I am asking for. And you are also wrong on the cognitive psychology being reliable (many of the failed replications in recent replication studies are from cognitive psych).
-
I was thinking relative to social psychology. Maybe you should be a big boy and do a search or learn to express yourself more clearly?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Self searching and awareness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dan Kahan’s work.....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not a falsifiable statement. Instead of asking what the best evidence could be, ask what a null hypothesis to this is. I don't see any
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.