Allowing some brown people into the country isn’t “putting your hand in a meat grinder”. Xenophobia is based far more on ignorance than fact.https://twitter.com/dpinsen/status/1065896220672094208 …
-
-
Replying to @vanillatary @thebellecurves
The homicide rate in Poland is 0.67 (per 100,000). How much higher should Poles be willing to let it rise to satisfy you? And where should they get “brown people” from? Pakistan? Its homicide rate is 6.6x higher than Poland’s. Ivory Coast? 17x higher.
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @dpinsen @thebellecurves
And the US's murder rate is nearly 8x higher. Can you say with a straight face that an influx of immigrants from the US to Poland that are representative of the US population would make native Poles worse off?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Murder is a tiny part of the equation when assessing the overall benefits and costs of immigration. The vast majority of people in every country are not murderous.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JustJoshinYou13 @thebellecurves
David Pinsen Retweeted Emil O W Kirkegaard
Here’s some data from
@KirkegaardEmil on fiscal costs versus benefits of immigrants from different countries to Europe.https://twitter.com/kirkegaardemil/status/1066071305865359360?s=21 …David Pinsen added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't oppose spending lots of money on welfare for African and Muslim immigrants but if you do, why are you opposing the immigration and not the welfare policy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You can't take down the welfare state, but you can limit immigration. Besides, if you let immigrants in and did away with welfare, they would vote left parties in, and implement the welfare state again. You always end up paying for low tier people if you don't guard the border.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.