I'm pretty sure more than 20% will do it w their kids once tech is mature/cheap/readily available.
-
-
-
Up from 15% in 2014, similar question. Please can haz S-surve growth soon. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/01/chapter-5-public-views-about-biomedical-issues/ …pic.twitter.com/TNt8ByBDSq
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I genuinely can’t think of a single non-idiotic argument against it.
-
China is likely going to mandate embryo selection while the rest of the world endlessly debates regulation while paying a large price for not being early adopters.
-
What evidence that China is on this path?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Inactive for years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also fairly sure IVF polled/would poll much worse, and all the bioethicist consternation about it disappeared overnight after it was deemed legal and became mundane
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
But how many of those will still say the same if reminded that embryo selection = eugenics?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is coming and will be unstoppable. Parents will pay any price to give their kids a leg up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Has anyone heard of mate selection for intelligence? Why start with bad materials, and make expensive repairs? That's not a good strategy for complex systems. The name Dr Moreau springs to mind...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there any method (real or hypothetical) to achieve the same result without destroying embryos?
-
Yes, use polar bodies and sibling sperm to do gamete selection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.