I am getting incresingly suspicious of people who identify themselves as "speakers"...
Impressively stupid piece in Forbes by a busybody with who knows how many degrees in all the shit tier fields. Desire to control other people with ethics is inversely related to quantitative competence in the field in question. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jessicabaron/2018/10/22/dont-believe-the-headline-hype-when-it-comes-to-genomics-research/#103251296e5c …pic.twitter.com/Hod0E84Qk6
-
-
-
Speaker = pay me big $$$ to come tell you conveniently PC false stories. Cf. Angela Duckworth (grit woman), Gladwell (assorted falsehoods), Amy Cuddy (power posing woman), et al.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Love explained variance turning into "succeeds 11% of the time". Pretty good to predict IQ exactly 11% of the time!
-
Yeah, we were wondering about the origin of that one and came up with the same theory. First she converted %variance into %accurate, and then into "algorithm fails 11% of time".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
jfc who edits forbes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.