Emil O W Kirkegaard

I do know that, it's demonstrable by the political stances and policy proposals of people who claim to hold such a position. This isn't a good faith stance that people maintain.

You misunderstood. I'm saying you don't know that there is 0 genetic basis for group differences.

Oh, yeah I know that's what the evidence strongly indicates now and that there is not theoretical foundation for why any would exist for these traits. That supports the inference.

Rindermann's survey has been shown to be flawed and have no bearing on the discussion before. Poor response rate and design make it hardly representative of anything. Why don't we talk about the ASHG and AAA statements or this letter https://cehg.stanford.edu/letter-from-population-geneticists …

Moreover, citing 'letters' is also not very compelling, as your opponents can cite their own http://www.intelligence.martinsewell.com/Gottfredson1997.pdf …

The letter that was ignored or refused by over half the people it was sent to and that contains hardly any actual IQ researchers but tons of Pioneer Fun supported racists? Very convincing stuff

Once again, that argument is weak, as it requires demonstrating that a) the letter was ignored or refused BECAUSE they objected to the science (as opposed to social/career considerations); and b) that the letters you cite reflect the consensus of the discipline and aren't...