@brembs This study also failed to find association with journal impact factor and a quality measure.https://www.nature.com/articles/gim2017230 …
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
I don't see why IF should be expected to correlate with pathogenicity? Or is the database they source exclusively populated with gene-disease association studies?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brembs @KirkegaardEmil
In other words, do the authors exclusively look at reported pathogenicity levels (e.g., effect sizes of associations?) and find that the reliability of these reports is not related with IF?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @brembs
Yes, reports in higher IF journals do not seem to show more likely pathogeneticity than those in lower IF journals.
7:18 AM - 11 Oct 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.