Worth a Delphic process. Rushton was Jensen's bulldog, and no-one has since done quite the same job. However, job requirements change. GWAS researchers lead the pack now.
I was asked in private: Who has done the best job of picking up Jensen’s baton? Especially with regard to g. It seems appropriate to get a public discussion among the knowledgeable, not just my opinion. :)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with
@JamesPsychol. It's in the hands of the geneticists at this point. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think the educational attainment GWAS studies are where the science is advancing, along with neuroimaging. But no one wants to be the lightening rod for the blank slatist paramilitaries. Charles Murray would be that now. There are plenty of others contributing well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He wasn't a one-dimensional researcher. In what capacity? Race question? Prominence of hereditarianism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.