It was interesting to see that Tim Gowers has the exact same issues with the poor arguments of the paper as I did.https://twitter.com/waltzingmonkey/status/1039154253124837381?s=21 …
That mathematician's paper that you weren't allowed to read by the censors. Here it is. It's incredibly mild, but deep implications for sex differences in occupations that require rare (combinations of) traits. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04184 pic.twitter.com/GOSMc6A7Oo
-
-
-
But additionally, all nonhominid traits for which there was evidence linked were also dimorphic! So previous authors have simply been scaling variance linearly and proportionally! But that’s not how variance works in dynamics...
-
It appears this paper of poor scholarship was accepted - as apparently admitted by the author in his Quillette article - for political reasons. The first editor even had the author add political content!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.