It would be great to have a chart (if one is even possible) showing how political composition of those fields had evolved over the last 100-150 years. There are reasons to believe that anthropology was the first field to be afflicted by the form of radicalism that prevails today.
Diversity by academic field. Science does not work well with this kind of representation bias due to the relevance of personal politics for all kinds of matters scientific - what to study, which results to push for/emphasize, which to publish, reviewing. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=664042 …pic.twitter.com/unaePOjheK
-
-
-
I don't know of any good plots with timelines by field, but there are some timelines. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Political-diversity-will-improve-social-science.-Duarte-Crawford/7cab16bfa3553f86c8fc585dc3527ede244ac7ce … https://righteousmind.com/viewpoint-diversity/ …pic.twitter.com/uU4OxIgvaM
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It work well in Russia for Lysenko. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. In a perfect academic system this wouldn't matter but our current system is incredibly flawed. Still the Polsci and Economics ratios surprise me - I'd have thought it would be closer to 2:1 at least
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.