You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
How about this for an alternative? LGBT folks who perceive more discrim (in their words "minimize" it), are more likely to be dysphoric malcontents. (this says exactly 0 about reality of actual discrim). Lilienfeld made a similar point about microaggressions:pic.twitter.com/ATTD56mLKA
@ZachG932 did a bunch of regressions recently that support this view.
I mean, its an obvious potential alternative that my field simply ignores most of the time. I wonder why that might be. No idea. From my 2016 chapter on the Politics of Social Psych: Distortions in Social Psych of Intergroup Relationspic.twitter.com/U0JUKX9GZh
It's really obvious that self reported discrimination is some function of actual discrimination, personality traits related to social perception and mental issues. So from known differences in these traits, we expect eg women to report more (higher neuroticism).
Emil, I crafted a reply channeling @TitaniaMcGrath. But I could probably get fired for tweeting it. So I will refrain and, instead, let her speak for herself:
https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1031835161988612097 …
Lee, I'm noticing a tendency in these types of articles that is somewhat similar to one of your criticisms of the stereotype inaccuracy literature: assuming 'pervasive discrimination' without actually establishing the base-rate. For example:pic.twitter.com/IhdSlR2rl9
But is hiring discrimination against LGBT minorities 'pervasive'? That depends on the definition of 'pervasive', which the authors fail to clarify. FWIW, here's some data on this question. You be the judge.pic.twitter.com/2p5xOJ8Kat
I should add that if the above qualifies as 'pervasive', one must proceed to clarify what the non-pervasive base rate would be.
Looks like the Black Hole phenomena again. How can they declare ANYTHING pervasive w/o a single citation?pic.twitter.com/IpNEO9sAGp
To be fair, they did include a citation. The problem (in addition to it being an audit study; see Heckam (1998) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.12.2.101 …) is that the findings therein do not unambiguously support the 'pervasiveness' of anti-lgbt employment discrimination.pic.twitter.com/6lM5yRmFKb
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
