Emil O W Kirkegaard

The idea that appearing in the same room as @peterbrimelow disqualifies you from polite society is pernicious & I'll have no part of it. Now, I've been criticizing his commitment to white identity politics (a fairer description than "white supremacy" or "white nationalism") since

of Brimelow's valuable book" I've never written for his @Vdare site because it's oriented toward white identity politics (though not all the writers share in that) & I reject ethnic identity politics of all stripes (including the Armenian variety) as post-American & subversive of

national cohesion. In fact, @peterbrimelow mocks me & CIS for "triangulation", as though our commitment to a robust trans-ethnic American nationalism were merely a pose to get invited to @NRO cruises. That said, neither he nor @vdare traffics in violence or illegality or

We also include relevant articles from @vdare in the weekly CIS roundup of commentary from all sides, and will continue to do so (much to the chagrin of the SPLC's hate-sniffers). But where I disagree with @peterbrimelow it's because he's wrong, not evil. / fin

What's the country where there's been "robust trans-ethnic nationalism"? There's no shortage of trans-ethnic conflict, civil-war and genocide. But, like Communism, all the previous examples "just haven't done it right". So, what's the example that'll guide to success?

*Our* country is the example, until the cultural marxists launched their project of national deconstruction.