Independent replication of our Danish IQ and politics study. Seems results are quite similar. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060 …pic.twitter.com/1pI8RSqcF4
-
Hence my issue with intelligence studies today. Till we do not have a clear scientific testable idea of what the process of intelligence is and how it operates we cannot have a clear comparative approach to it. I doubt we will be able to have such unified definitive definition.
Random take much? You cannot approach the issue like it's a kind of word game. Read some of the introductions to the topic. There's a lot of data to go thru, >100 years of research.
-
-
As neuro-anthropologist I am quite acquainted to the literature. Working with neuroscientists the question I ask remains. There is no evidence of what we really measure with intelligence tests. It is even difficult to measure “intelligence” in non-humans.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In other words these studies are interpretative. Maybe one day when we have an agreed testable definition of intelligence we may have possibilities of doing comparative studies. At the present they are speculative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.