@KirkegaardEmil @dr_l_alexandre @MGigantoraptor @KokuzumaHatena @KehlLaurent @Daniel_Zantour @JamesPsychol @neuromonaco @Joffrey_Marrot @HassenOccident
The high Ashkenazi intelligence
https://onedrive.live.com/View.aspx?resid=31E02ADB1C372BA0!1655&app=PowerPoint&wdSlideId=256&wdModeSwitchTime=1534188064061&authkey=!AG0YB0h1AsXGRt0 …
I know, but seems odd the bias just keeps fitting with the phenotypic gap for every gap examined when they differ in direction etc. Better link re. this ishttps://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1014171677528395777 …
-
-
It fits. But not perfectly, and it exaggerates the gap. Gap which couldn't, in certain case for certain traits, be accounted by the effect of the genes alone.
-
I just wanted to make it clear, even if you surely already know that.
-
Highly clear now, thanks.
@KirkegaardEmil Kokuzuma is a wonderfull guy. Such an impassibility in the face of facts... while strong belief in absurd nonsenses. Below a table from his paper written to "debunk my website".pic.twitter.com/2IzTXrRCEQ
-
Kokuzuma and I think your work is, indeed, non sense. However, to create the best atmosphere in favor of a scientific debate I consider that repeating these kinds of personal judgments is not the way to go. Do you agree? If yes, I urge you to wait for our answer and shut it.
-
I never tought I will find something convincing in your paper, and I was of course right it's a childlish succession of absurdities and every man with a brain will agree ;) But now that you are aware of the scientific litterature I begin to think you have simply bad faith.
-
Absurdities like pretending that low IQ will cause people to be more religious ? The other way around seems more logical to us. Correlations and causalities are quite undistinguishable from each other for you. Je vais cesser d'intervenir dans ce fil, bonne nuit tout de même.
-
Absolutely, low I.Q produces magical belief like religion and, as brain size and intelligence increase, you have a shift to more rational thinking. The other way isn't, we already explain you that intelligence is genetic, even if you have some difficulties to understand.
-
And you have some huge difficulties to accept the data you gave, in addition to be dubious (you'll see), can just provide hypotheses in major cases, the other one being as well possible and even cited by some of your prefered scientists. 1/3
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.