As hereditarianism wins terrain with the development of genomics, it's time to revisit the pioneers of behavioral genetics who were right all along while being denigrated for decades by the politically correct. New piece in Quillette does this for Bouchardhttps://quillette.com/2018/08/09/a-striking-similarity-the-revolutionary-findings-of-twin-studies/ …
-
From my perspective, and I assume yours as well, the evidence has been clear for decades. Do you think mapping/labeling the terrain already taken will convince those who are not currently convinced? Or do you think the next generation will be more accepting of these results?
Genomics is the final nail in coffin, directly measured effects of genetic variation and their outcomes. Of course, Turkheimer people will keep going on about how we lack a story for each gene, but not kidding anyone at that point. FUD only works up to a point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.