I have yet to see a convincing meta-analysis on this subject. All of the reasonably broad ones I have encountered fail to reject the null for a difference in mean, though most show marginally higher variance for males. Obviously also depends on the subscales and coeffs for g.
-
-
Thanks; this looks closer to what I had in mind. Again, given caveats about choice of subscales etc. I hope there are plenty of funnel plots as well.
-
Probably not. But I'd bet that there's pub bias in favor of null sex differences.
-
Overall? Perhaps. In this publication, though, I might reasonably expect the opposite. Anyway, need meta-analysis to make much sense of the results as a whole.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.