First they came for Alex's Jones freedom of speech. I didn't care because I wasn't a loony conspiracy theorist. Then they came for... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lPhSreTkXc …
-
So... yeah... we should not engage in censoring. However... What is the difference between it being OK for a company to refuse making a "gay" wedding cake and it not being OK for a company (like Apple) to refuse to host a person like Alex Jones?
One is global social media site with huge influence over just about everything. Other is some random person making cakes of no importance?
-
-
That's part of what would be my answer too, but that also entails that we need to acknowledge that these huge companies play a monopoly role society might want to regulate. My point being that it seems someone is trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
HuffPost actually had a pretty good piece on this. ... which does not only apply to the US. Facebook also censors stuff which is OK in Denmark, but where the US PC culture is different. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/alex-jones-first-amendment_us_5b6d9b57e4b0530743c95939 … I do think though that he underestimates the network effects
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.