@ZachG932 this one looks more symmetrical than your usual finding of leftists going more extreme. But since it uses party data, one can't really tell the hypotheses apart.
Show this thread
Considering the importance of assortative mating for politics in pair bonding, this does not bode well for US white fertility in near future. Lefties need to stop fanning the flames for the gender war.pic.twitter.com/3IiIp9Bjwh
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks, we were just speculating about this over lunch. In the SFBA, I personally know at least four couples who broke up over political discordance. Bear in mind, my old precinct went 90+% for HRC.
-
Now we just have to wait for some economists to come along and find a way to apply an RD or DD design to this question. :p
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yep. Liberals are basically selecting against themselves. Many have noticed this, but liberals tend to keep increasing in numbers despite this selection because the environmental effects are so much stronger. This is also the case for atheism.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314324341_The_Future_of_Secularism_a_Biologically_Informed_Theory_Supplemented_with_Cross-Cultural_Evidence …
End of conversation
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Could you please explain this in simpler terms?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't "rightists, i.e. the people who actually care about fertility, need to get with the program" an equally valid interpretation? :P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dividing men and women along political fault lines just has to be the worse social experience ever. The left has lost the plot...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.