Vote counting in a meta-analysis/research review? What is this, 1975?
-
-
-
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Authors emphasize how well the programs work for lifelong outcomes, but their own table shows that 68% of the programs' outcomes were "NULL" by their own criteria. That doesn't sound very successful to me.
-
Proponents of universal pre-K are resting their hopes on long-term "sleeper" effects that don't show up until adolescence. What puzzles me is HOW going to preschool will make a teenager decide to not drop out of HS. What on earth is this causal mechanism?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is sad, given RAND's history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That chart is from the study? I'm confused on how you conclude results are favorable if most studies get null results on all measured attributes. Is there some other analysis or is this a conclusion don't match the data study?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.