Latest in verbal tilt creationism. https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2018/07/22/natural-selection-is-not-an-explanatory-mechanism/ …pic.twitter.com/yFpLwWgvGS
-
Exactly. But why spend time figuring out where the verbal trick is when one can move on to moving science forward? Opportunity cost. Sesardic was correct he he noted that some of the most important work of philosophers is defending science against other philosophers...pic.twitter.com/8BdsAFY2C0
The analogy to the ontological argument seems apt. One can construct elaborate modal ontological arguments which are hard to understand and look fancy, but ultimately the simple perfect island type replies are perfectly reasonable. One doesn't need to learn modal logic.
-
-
For those wondering about the specific example of modal ontological argument, see here. http://analyticabstraction.blogspot.com/2007/11/philosophy-of-religion-2-natural_14.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.