You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It's reverse skin in the game, actually. If they don't publish more PC findings, or publish unPC findings, they risk their career. The incentive is towards PC findings. If truth is racist, and you can't publish racist stuff, then you can't publish true stuff about these matters.
You are just a bad person. Probably literally Hitler. But we knew that already... OTO more serious H, some of us believe the truth can't be racist. Of course, people can present racist distortions as truth. Sometimes, it is not easy to tell which is which.
And actually your point about reverse incentives looks dead on right to me. You only need a few cases of punishment to create a stigma. Then, after the stigma creators suppress all alternative views, they can and do declare "scientific" victory -- "hey, we have consensus!"
One could investigate this by comparing anonymous surveys of opinions vs. published opinions. I bet it would show huge effect for causes of group gaps. We're doing a citation analysis of Intelligence papers, and we found that papers on race get fewer citations.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
