As much as I like being listed as keynote speaker for #IMPS2018, I do think that the 12 - 1 male - female ratio in keynote and invited speakers *is* striking... https://www.psychometricsociety.org/content/imps-2018 …
-
-
Replying to @SachaEpskamp
Psychometrics is an autistic male thing, what do you expect? :p
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @SachaEpskamp
FYI saying something like this makes you seem like a real asshole
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NeuroPost @SachaEpskamp
Only to those who false assume I dislike autistic male things.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @SachaEpskamp
No, in general. It comes across as you saying women aren’t able to handle psychometrics. Also seems like you’re stereotyping people with ASD as all being mathematicians
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeuroPost @SachaEpskamp
Stereotypes are accurate. Psychometrics is heavily male despite a subfield of a female field, just like the other quant heavy subfields. Not a coincidence. (PS, don't strawman people by adding your own universal quantifiers)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @SachaEpskamp
Just to be clear, are you arguing that the reason for quant psych being a male dominated field is that women are worse at math?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeuroPost @SachaEpskamp
That too. Less interested in quanty things in general.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @SachaEpskamp
And are you aware that that is a textbook example of sexism?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sexism is true. Stop thinking in isms. Think in numbers.
-
-
Muted for being too obnoxious.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.