I'm not in favor of either ghetto law or Burka ban, but if we can't get any proper reform, then maybe we will have to make do with these minor annoyance laws...
-
So... it is about values? Let me be clear. I would welcome any Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Maajid Nawaz, or Gary Kasparov.... But we should protect them against people like Anjem Choudary... That's significantly more important than whether they can spell "Oehlenschläger" or eat pork.
Your refusal to deal with practical reality is annoying. You can't get your dreamy ideas implemented. You can maybe get something like a Burka ban. Do you think mass Muslim immigration to Denmark is working out well? No, well, then find a way to reduce it -- in practice.
-
-
I'm not refusing to deal with practical reality just because I think many of the questions for Danish citizenship are stupid. ...get real. This "in practice" thing can't even be evaluated via Twitter. All I'm saying is that the "solutions" of DF are illiberal.
-
Liberal or illiberal, doesn't matter in itself. Thinking too much like a natural law libertarian. Net benefit matters. I'll take a Burka ban if we can avoid another 100k welfare immigrants. Burka ban, though silly, has essentially zero impact on my way of life.
-
... just saying that there are perfectly rational and non-silly ways to do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhrZRW2PdkQ …
-
We're back to ignoring reality and living in dreamy Peter-land where you can get random policies implemented and don't have to deal with realpolitik.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.