Similar weird results for British&Irish and French&German. These issues probably related to the predictor's performance across generations, which mix up the blocks used in training. They presumably used old people with no foreign ancestry (e.g. all 8 GGPs local) for training.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The more specific/local the reference populations are, the less stable the results are. But at the continental level, ancestry results are pretty trustworthy.
-
Of course, but in my results, the Scandi% is obviously wrong considering the results for my family, esp. parents. Seems to be due to chip changes, according to another reply. I have the old chip (961k SNPs), other 3 have newer chip (600ish).
-
This or your mother ...
-
Have 50% IBD with her.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you see much change when going to a more conservative confidence level?
-
At most conservative. Just moved a lot of stuff to broad.pic.twitter.com/ZqYqLq8F1c
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry about that 2.9%.
-
No sorry, it gives me an estimated 0.29 IQ advantage over my purebred Scandi friends.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Cool. ^^
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2.9% Ashkenazi not too shabby
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ur black, you can ask for reparations now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always tell people to try this: http://gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/K15.htm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.