Randomly assigning 400 elderly people to take fish oil (docosahexaenoic acid) or placebo did not alter intelligence over 18 months in double blind study. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/107/5/754/4979660 …pic.twitter.com/4OxcIvcKn2
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I honestly don't know about those but I'm just going by what people need and what they get. If your diet is junk food, you may not be getting much if any of certain things. Ergo, multivitamin. Shouldn't this make sense?
Lots of things make sense but are false. Big multi-vitamin study can't even find an effect on IQ in Nepal. I want these diet people to put up or shut up. There's essentially no evidence for anything they say, and lots of ignored evidence against. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7106
Might their diets not have been pretty sufficient? I mean it's not as if people don't die of vitamin A deficiency and such. *At some point* they must be helpful and good.
Well, apparently, that some point is not even reached in Nepal -- a median country with respect to development. Why keep pushing for things that have no evidence and tons of contrary evidence? So annoying and I start being mean.
No, yeah, I follow you. Just trying to figure out exactly how much I can ignore things. How much can I live on junk food and it not matter at all? For anything? I mean if I'm going to have the same body/health whether I eat ice cream or spinach, I'll eat ice cream.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.