Turkheimer strikes back! (but misses) http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7267
-
-
You have no scientific evidence to back up your views on group differences. You just like to tell us 'oh we'll have something soon ..' lol
-
Surely you mean the extant scientific evidence is not sufficient to meet whatever standard you have, right? If you state that sandard, your claim can be evaluated.
-
Why don't you just show us your scientific evidence and let us judge?
-
Why would anyone submit to that demand? You can always just change your standard post-hoc.
-
So you don't have any. As i thought
-
I could say the same for your epistemic standards; but I wouldn't presume.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He was a good enough researcher in a podunk field who is past his prime and chooses to use his graying years intentionally obfuscating science, & delivering personal slurs, based on an ideology he unthinkingly took up in youth. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but 0 value in engaging.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.