Turkheimer strikes back! (but misses) http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7267
Show this thread
-
Probably safe to just ignore him at this point. He's an aging, irrelevant academic who will live just long enough to see his life's work rent to nothing. But I get the urge to respond.
I meant what I said about him earlier. I do think he is a good researcher, but clearly misguided about group differences, and according to his own words, apparently so for moral-political reasons. He has an ideological blindspot, but many people do.
-
-
He was a good enough researcher in a podunk field who is past his prime and chooses to use his graying years intentionally obfuscating science, & delivering personal slurs, based on an ideology he unthinkingly took up in youth. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but 0 value in engaging.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have no scientific evidence to back up your views on group differences. You just like to tell us 'oh we'll have something soon ..' lol
-
Surely you mean the extant scientific evidence is not sufficient to meet whatever standard you have, right? If you state that sandard, your claim can be evaluated.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.