What's the sweet spot though? It varies with environment surely, but what would be optimal now? Obviously societies with lowest values (worldwide) are mostly shitholes.
-
-
-
Japan and Korea have a good combo going. The data above are European only. Inside Europe, Czech is perhaps the best combo.
-
Ideal would be a society that is completely open to other race/ethnicity but only allows in people who are also tolerant. Educated immigrants in the anglosphere fit that.
-
Japan and Korea are stable but significant progress has really only happened within open western societies. I'm afraid that such low openness would require us to also accept civilizational stasis
-
That sounds better than civilizational collapse. Maybe we could move some NW Euros to Czech and they can provide the engine of progress while the majority native population keep their universalism in ... Czech... ;)
-
Sure, but those talking about collapse are hypochondriacs. They're like the people worried about the "climate crisis". It's not the end of the world. Maybe a moot point anyway. Genetic engineering in the next generation is going to dramatically change everything.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"pathological altruism"? et tu, emil? (~_^) as greg cochran says, our genes didn't evolve to kill us.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
not on this one. wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong! it's misleading.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
i <3 the, romans!
-
What do you want to call it?
-
Dysfunctional or maladaptive altruism in the 21th century. If some predictions are true, it will definitely turn out to be
-
i prefer something like "runaway universalism," altho i'm not too happy with that, either, tbh. lookin' for something neutral. bland, boring, yet informative. (~_^) maladaptive isn't so bad, but we don't know the end of this story yet, do we?
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed. Denmark really wising up lately, and it was always ahead of Sweden in that regard.https://www.vdare.com/articles/denmark-can-the-silent-carriage-survive …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wouldn't that mean NW europeans deserve to disappear? It means their culture is badly adapted to the current environment. Only mediterraneans and slavs seem to be clannish enough to do anything about foreign invasion.
-
You seem to invoke naturalistic fallacy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What makes a problematic foreigner? Is a problematic foreigner worse than a problematic native citizen? And if not, what makes "NW European altruism" pathological?
-
We can get rid of, or better yet, never allow in, problematic foreigners. And the reason the world looks as it does clearly shows that there are a LOT more problematic people as % of non-NW European peoples than % of NW European who are problematic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.