You seeing this @LJZigerell?
Show this thread
Dutch n = 2,064, 86 classrooms pre-registered stereotype threat study for females and math finds... drum roll... d = -.05, p > .05. http://programme.exordo.com/isir2018/delegates/presentation/47/ …pic.twitter.com/t1XcI2H2Hv
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Paulette Flore is certainly not surprised given her previous meta-analysis which found a lot of suspicious patterns. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440514000831 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@JelteWicherts is there a preprint available yet? -
Looks like it's part of Paulette Flore's PHD dissertation which is already public. https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/en/publications/stereotype-threat-and-differential-item-functioning(c8d3dfe8-9adf-476b-a649-1931272cfffa).html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is there good evidence that the stereotype is present/known among Dutch high school students? And if not, is this study informative of stereotype threat at all?
-
I was wondering the same thing. In her thesis,Flore cites Miller et al. (2015) to support the existing stereotype (doi:10.1037/edu0000005). What questions me with this study are: the collective setting, the neutralisation/control condition, and the huge effect of P's gender.
-
Here is the thesis: https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/files/23445144/Flore_Stereotype_7_3_2018.pdf … The study in question begins on page 57.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
2 The problem is that multilevel modeling flattens uncorrelated curves along multiple planar vectors. Distribution curves around each cluster point aren't normalized. Thus the flattened results are inherently biased by spatial distribution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1 I agree with the findings (personal experience and research bias), but the methodologies used offend me because they're taken seriously. I see "multilevel modeling" and think to myself "forced linear correlation along an arbitrary plane never works for social networks".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No problem. We just continue to cite all the studies that do show the effect, and ignore the studies that didn't. Isn't that right
@PsychRabble? -
But did they give them marshmallows?
-
The ultimate experiment: Socially primed marshmallow stereotype threat!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.