Emil O W Kirkegaard

Ehhhhh idk about that lol. Honestly I hate whining about how the science isn't conclusive enough to make political statements about, but it isn't. Maybe 20 years from now these problems will be tractable enough to be political, but right now they absolutely are not.

Your argument is basically that hierarchies are just self-evidently natural, which means that eugenics is a good idea. Regardless of whether or not that's true that's not even close to enough to base an effective eugenics program on. And there's also a bunch of ethical and

practical questions you'd need to deal with first.

One of Marx's key insights was that using abstract terms like "hierarchy" to explain things necessarily leads to misunderstanding the world, which keeps you from acting optimally. His whole thing is understanding how social relations/abstractions interact with material reality.