So he's saying that a Caucasian has more in common genetically with a Negro than he does with another Caucasian? Sounds like counter-intuitive bullshit to me, of the distinctive flavour that postmodernists peddle.
-
-
-
Some people say that, but Lewontin didn't say that, and of course it is not true and easily seen as wrong in datasets where one can calculate the pairwise fst for all persons.
-
Some shitlibs were also saying that your views on race are irrelevant because you're a paedophile. Are they just making this shit up or what?
-
Schizophrenic stalker. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?page_id=7034 … Follow the links.
-
I can only presume you blocked him a long time ago?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Steve Hsu's discussion of Lewontin's Fallacy with pictures. http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2008/11/human-genetic-variation-fst-and.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His fallacy isn't underlined in red, though. Lewontin's Fallacy is his conclusion that there's "no genetic or taxonomic significance," a conclusion based on an inappropriate metric.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do Lewontin's arguments apply to human-Neanderthals differences too?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.