1) Our new genome-wide association study for IQ (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04362-x …) included the peripheral result that some genes linked to higher IQ are also linked to higher likelihood of poor eyesight. Here's how the media bollocksed up the coverage of it in almost every way:
-
Show this thread
-
2) The Telegraph turned a genetic correlation of .29 into "those who were more intelligent were nearly 30 per cent more likely to have genes indicating they require reading glasses" (!?!?):https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/05/29/glasses-wearers-really-intelligent-genes/ …
6 replies 21 retweets 113 likesShow this thread -
3) The Telegraph also described a sample size (44,480) that's nowhere near the actual sample size of the study (300,486). None of us have any idea where this number came from. It was repeated in several other stories. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
2 replies 13 retweets 110 likesShow this thread -
4) The lead author of the study is Gail Davies. This article (http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/wear-glasses-you-really-are-smarter-according-to-science/ …) says "Gail Davis". This article (https://theweeklyobserver.com/people-wear-glasses-genetic-predisposition-smarter/34660/ …) says "Gaye Davis". Because, well, fuck it.
1 reply 8 retweets 115 likesShow this thread -
5) The Guardian thought that it would be a good idea to include a finger-wagging virtue-signal about how "linking intelligence to DNA can quickly lead to bogus "race science". Thanks guys.https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/may/30/glasses-smarter-study-intelligence-bad-eyesight-link-health-benefits …
5 replies 19 retweets 149 likesShow this thread
Race differences in myopia are well known, something you surely know.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.