You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This can be solved by targeted policies though. Highly educated women want more children than less educated women. They are just less likely to get them if society doesn't cater to their needs (parental leave and free childcare instead of money for children)
>Highly educated women want more children than less educated women. No they don't. There is a similar dysgenics pattern among number of desired children. Nordic countries have really strong parental leave laws, and still subreplacement fertility.
OK, let's say they want the same number. In some countries they want more, in others less. The Nordics however have also stopped dysgenic fertility among their native populations. Doesn't help them much with their dysgenic immigration for sure, but ...pic.twitter.com/OuBL7luCN9
In OKCupid data, clear negative slope for desired number. But yes, these OECD surveys don't find much for the education variant of this pattern (as you show). I don't think Nordics have stopped dysgenics among natives either. Here's some DK data. https://osf.io/3p4dx/ pic.twitter.com/84AYL8cCWx
The data are not perfect for this question, especially not because of the problem of the non-westerners exaggerating the negative pattern, but I think it remains if one controls for non-western status, but it hasn't been done.
Interesting study btw! If you take data from the Wittgenstein Database on education and demography, these are the figures for Denmark (adjusted for actual fertility): Total 1.73 children University educated 1.70 Upper secondary 1.74 Lower levels 1.76
That is however just the women's side. Male fertility usually is more eugenic than female fertilty (incels and stuff) so could be that Denmark is already in the green based on these figures and that assumption, even including immigrants
Denmark has super high rate of IVF usage at 8% of babies born (!), which is broadly eugenic, both because it improve offspring quality and because it raises fertility among older women who are smarter etc.
...but they show that theoretically, it is possible to turn the thing around.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
