-
-
My takeaway was that I love in a Twitter bubble and that news of the replication crisis has not reached many universities. I probably found 8 posters about grit, for example.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Thanks Russell! It is indeed difficult to keep track of the many studies. And at the same time you see people referring in submitted papers to work which is not replicated as if it still applies. But will look into the program of
#aps18sf for relevant studies in my domain.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I was at APS. You can indeed see two groups emerging, also at the conference. There were some great sessions on open science, methodology, etc. But I've also seen a few posters/talks with far-fetched (non pre-reg) hypotheses, n < 20, etc. Change is happening, but not instantly...
4 replies 4 retweets 15 likes -
I just desk rejected a paper from an author from your own lovely uni - n = 12, 8 p-values between .02 and .06, effect sizes so implausibly large they can not be caused by any psychological mechanism.... So yeah, change is slow ;)
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
Tell them to keep the hypotheses the same, but gather 9 times more data, then come back with n = 120 and report the exact same analyses. Might still be underpowered, I don't know what the effects were supposed to be, but this is one way.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.