In the same way a bakery has the right to modify its service?
-
-
Additionally, there is no law that requires them to be a platform or a publisher, that just isn't a thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The platform vs publisher is their excuse to escape accountability. I don't agree with them, I'm just repeating their stance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, it isn't. Their immunity for user content says nothing about platforms and makes no distinction between the two. That's a myth that's been debunked.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Then I need to watch their recent testimonies before Congress again, because I'd bet money I heard those terms being used by company reps and leaders.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nah, read the actual law and court rulings, those hearings were meaningless, and clowns like rubio and hawley were flat out lying. If you don't believe those hearings were meaningless, ask yourself why these companies aren't doing anything differently since then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We agree!
The hearings were utterly meaningless.
CEOs and other company leaders were astonishingly uninformed about their companies practices, but they did promise to have their "teams" reply later.
Those hearings were for awareness and just a first step.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
LMAO Their lawyers know what they're doing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They and their lawyers know what they're doing. They just won't admit it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There's nothing to admit. Your paranoia and lack of understanding about the law and their rights are the flaws in your argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Okay. Bye bye.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

