Opens profile photo
Follow
Kimberly Marten
@KimberlyMarten
Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University; international security specialist, Russia watcher
New Yorkbarnard.edu/profiles/kimbe…Joined April 2012

Kimberly Marten’s Tweets

Thread: is this a new Russian propaganda tool? Running ultra-cheap bars in Europe where “locals” loudly discuss Ukrainian war night after night, using Russian talking points?
Quote Tweet
1/13 Here's a Russian propaganda story for @christogrozev un @bellingcat right out of the movies. We're in Venice, unintentionally eavesdropping on a conversation between 2 Russian guys (a bartender and his friend) and one of the regulars... So 🧵
Show this thread
2
Pretty remarkable OSINT work here. If OSINT can identify these apparent drone launching sites/possible Iranian presence, so can UKR military.
Quote Tweet
A little 🧵Based on reports from partisans and WEBINT and other #OSINT, we have put together a list of locations where Iranians have reportedly been spotted recently. Most of these sightings take place in Crimea, although also Belarus seems to be a hotspot
Show this thread
Image
4
(1 of 3) This piece implies that a credible threat of nuclear use by Russia should lead to negotiation, since use of a nuclear weapon is the worst thing we can imagine.
Quote Tweet
The Kremlin’s disproportionate and destructive response to the blowing up of the Kerch bridge connecting Russia and Crimea contains two significant lessons, writes Carnegie's @AlexGabuev in this piece for @FT ft.com/content/c77e57
2
5
Show this thread
Any appeaser calling for negotiations with Russia needs to explain how the result of these negotiations is going to be more credible than 1. The Russian-Ukrainian Border Treaty 2. The Budapest Memorandum 3. The NATO-Russia Founding Act 4. The Helsinki Final Act 5. The UN Charter
Quote Tweet
And here's Putin's signature (on the right) on the 2003 agreement between Russia and Ukraine demarcating the two countries' borders. The agreement is lodged with the UN.
Image
98
6,551
Show this thread
Exc thread discussing 1997 paper by Barry Posen on why aggression/seizure of territory by a nuclear-armed state using conventional weapons can’t be allowed to stand. Can’t live in “Conventional forces take; nuclear forces hold!” world. Asks: what if Saddam (wrt Kuwait)had nukes?
Quote Tweet
Putin announces the illegal annexation of more of Ukrainian territory today, and states: “"We will defend our lands with all the means at our disposal.” Presumably a reference to nuclear weapons. How should this affect thinking about the war? 🧵1/10
Show this thread
3
19