You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
1) Lost in this spat is that it ignores a bigger question. There were two outrageous aspects to that Jan. 2017 briefing. One is the subject of this dispute: Who pushed to include dossier in the briefing, clearly as a hook for media to then run with the dossier allegations?
2) But the other outrage of that briefing was the deliberate decision not to tell Trump the whole truth--that dossier was being used as a basis to investigate members of his campaign. If FBI had any reason to suspect anyone in Trump's orbit, incoming Prez needed to know
3) Especially if FBI was actively looking at Flynn, who was about to become NSA! There was no reason not to brief, since according to FBI, Trump was not a subject. Who decided not to give Trump a FULL briefing about dossier? To deliberately hide this from new commander in chief?
4) Comey alone? Clapper? Brennan? Obama White House? That's a question that is as big as this one.
https://fxn.ws/2E9gPUc #FoxNews
As a counter intelligence investigation, the intent should have been to protect Trump from Russian influence, not prosecute him for it.
Unless of course the Russian influence was - at least in part - originated inside our own government institutions... as a type of double agent style staged attempt that was then used as a basis of a "counter intelligence" investigation of an opposition party. Outrageous if true.
Well if the President was under investigation they should not have shown him the evidence at all. The FBI and DOJ withhold documents pending investigations they don’t show them to the Perpetrators.
Remember this was not a Trump investigation. It was a Russian interference, counterintelligence investigation.
Yes. This is even more important. Deceptively withholding information was tantamount to lying. At some point by end of March, Trump realized that Comey was dishonest with him and could not be trusted. Thus, his decision to fire him, even if adverse consequences.
They didn’t even tell him who funded it.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
