Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KhazWolf's profile
Khaz
Khaz
Khaz
@KhazWolf

Tweets

Khaz

@KhazWolf

I write stories, music, assembly code, opinions... I write too much. Sometimes I like NSFW posts. If you follow me twitter might shove 'em in your TL. Sorry

Canada
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
      Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and

      If it were done for no reason, it would be. For curing phimosis, it is the most minimally-invasive surgical solution available. It doesn't removie pieces. That's how surgery is supposed to be: doing as little damage as possible, once non-surgical options are exhausted.

      1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
    2. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
      Replying to @KhazWolf @Gregory_Malchuk and

      It might be minimally invasive but has a far higher risk. You’re no longer cutting loose skin, you’re cutting across the top of the frenulum and urethral artery and if you go wrong it can lead to more nerve damage than circumcision and possibly sepsis. I’m not convinced.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Gregory Malchuk‏ @Gregory_Malchuk Oct 17
      Replying to @_Undersized_ @KhazWolf and

      You obviously have no clue of the anatomy of the penis.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
      Replying to @Gregory_Malchuk @KhazWolf and

      You should probably tell me why, because it seems like I’m right here. A lateral cut along your penis does get dangerously close to the urethral artery. But no need to be upset, if you have a qualification or evidence otherwise, I’m all ears.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
      Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and

      I gotta be totally frank here, you're talking outta your ass... You just learned preputioplasty exists moments ago but you already think you can declare which is more dangerous or harmful? How about you provide some evidence for a change? Circumcision cuts through veins too

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
      Replying to @KhazWolf @Gregory_Malchuk and

      Here’s a diagram, here’s the procedure. I know what the surgery is, I had it offered and chose circumcision. I’m being skeptical of the info here. Look at the artery, then the cut. I was told by a real doctor that it had a higher chance of sepsis, which is why I’m repeating it.pic.twitter.com/iGQgDvxhxj

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
      Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and

      Here's a study on the subject of preputioplasty that "confirms its low rate of postoperative complications and its good results in terms of preputial retractability and cosmetic outcomes". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539601/ … I also found another cool one I'm going over now

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    8. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
      Replying to @KhazWolf @_Undersized_ and

      Actually the thing I was reading isn't quite finished yet, here's a clinical trial still in progress for the rest of this year: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02854995 … Guess I'll keep an eye on that

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    9. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
      Replying to @KhazWolf @_Undersized_ and

      Another one, suggesting preputioplasty is a "good alternative" to circumcision: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429508008467 … And another! https://www.fimose.org/uploads/6/5/5/4/65544215/preputioplastyinchildren.pdf … "Preputioplasty is a faster, easier, relatively painless technique with excellent cosmetic results and lesser complications than" circ

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    10. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
      Replying to @KhazWolf @Gregory_Malchuk and

      Nice, but the original recommended circumcision in cases of recurring infection, and the second recommended it in cases of scarring, so my point still stands. In those cases we would have to go back and circumcise you, but it would be banned- so your dick would drop off.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
      Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and

      I'm not saying it's impossible for a circumstance to occur where it could be an option, but it should be treated like cutting off an arm: an extreme solution to extreme problems when every other option has failed. Such would be absurdly rare. Routine circumcision is abhorrent

      8:33 AM - 17 Oct 2018
      • 7 Likes
      • Poseidonc12 Reyos Blackwoood JL Jessica Rabbit 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇫🇷 ProtectChildren Sceptical Canuck Vaetan Thought
      2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @Gregory_Malchuk and

          Only 77% of U.S. men are circumcised. It isn’t routine. It has multiple detailed, legitimate medical uses. So tell me if it fits the definition of mutilation? I’m still looking to have my mind changed here.

          10 replies 1 retweet 1 like
        3. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
          Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and

          Amputation of normal functional tissue is mutilation. That's why amputation is considered a last resort for treatment in general. Sometimes in extenuating circumstances it's required to "mutilate" the body to prevent even greater damage or death.

          2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
        4. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @_Undersized_ and

          The point here is... The vast majority of American circumcisions are for no medical reason whatsoever. And the vast majority of circumcisions that ARE for a medical reason are for a reason that's invalid (preventing STDs), or a reason that can be cured with less invasive means.

          2 replies 2 retweets 9 likes
        5. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @Gregory_Malchuk and

          No. Circumcision was recommended in your medical paper as being for recurring infection or where tissue scarring occurs.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
          Replying to @_Undersized_ @Gregory_Malchuk and

          These are the uses (excuses) that doctors have come up with for it in modern times. It's not the reason why it was originally prescribed in america, it's not the reason why it was prescribed in religion. Those were both about damaging sexual function:pic.twitter.com/SD11hqaBWR

          1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
        7. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @_Undersized_ and

          Just imagine being one of these doctors when the sexual revolution of the past century hit. They made their careers on damaging kids sexually, and now suddenly that's a bad thing? They've been scrambling to justify it ever since, so people won't sue or try to get revenge or w/e

          1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
        8. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @Gregory_Malchuk and

          General surgeons do more than just circumcision, they don’t need to justify their practices to keep their job, you can’t suggest that circumcision is a religious practice because it was originally religious.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. 1 more reply
        1. New conversation
        2. Vaetan Thought‏ @VaetanThought Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @_Undersized_ and

          @_Undersized_ You're arguing that preputioplasty can cause sepsis, but you haven't once questioned the fact that after routine (nonmedical) circumcision, the penis has to heal in a diaper full of feces? And some children have phimosis until puberty, doesn't cause necrosis.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        3. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
          Replying to @VaetanThought @KhazWolf and

          I had phimosis until puberty which is why I’m using it as an argument. It does cause necrosis after an age of about 14. And non-medical circumcision? When did I say I was a fan of non-medical circumcision?

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Khaz‏ @KhazWolf Oct 17
          Replying to @_Undersized_ @VaetanThought and

          I wanna point something out, I don't mean it as offense or ad hominem, this isn't an insult or an argument, I'm just saying... Your particular life experience makes you vulnerable to two different kinds of bias here, namely: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice-supportive_bias …

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        5. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 17
          Replying to @KhazWolf @VaetanThought and

          1. It’s not a 50/50 procedure, most people don’t suffer major nerve damage. The level of sensitivity is perfectly fine and justified the procedure. 2. No, that doesn’t work because it’s not a shopping product, it’s a surgery. I had my options presented.

          2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
        6. Gregory Malchuk‏ @Gregory_Malchuk Oct 17
          Replying to @_Undersized_ @KhazWolf and

          The amount of nerve damage is horrendous, as the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.pic.twitter.com/Mausf3sP1M

          1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
        7. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 18
          Replying to @Gregory_Malchuk @KhazWolf and

          Why is the actual gland marked as the least sensitive and regular skin marked as more sensitive?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Gregory Malchuk‏ @Gregory_Malchuk Oct 18
          Replying to @_Undersized_ @KhazWolf and

          Because that is reality. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. The Royal Australian College of Physicians calls the foreskin "PRIMARY sensory tissue of the penis."

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        9. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info