Infant health is better everywhere. Circumcision is listed nowhere as a factor for any of it. Pretty simple really. I’d argue that circumcision is safer now than ever.
-
-
You haven't provided your own numbers because you don't have any. I'm not even debating with you if you give me nothing to debate against. I'm just educating you: This is the research that exists into the death rate from circumcision. Show me more if you have it.
-
Almost forgot, I have more still. Here's another showing that male circumcision can cause SIDS: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/07/339465 … Which helps to explain part of the reason why boys die from SIDS more than girls.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
BS? There a several acronyms you can consider when educating yourself or others on the benefits of circumcision. CPS, AAP, CDC, WHO are a few good ones but I hope you’re up to speed on those already.
-
#i2@AmAcadPeds@CDCgov@WHO are in general highly respected organizations, however on the subject of male circumcision there is evidence they are and have been called out by other equally respected medical organizations as culturally biased and susceptible to confirmation bias -
Nice breakdown of said cultural bias here:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527603_Cultural_bias_in_American_medicine_the_case_of_infant_male_circumcision …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.