Infant mortality rates. Causes. As published by the NICHD. What part of the thread are you jumping into haphazardly?
-
-
Cases like this wouldn't count: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/feb/17/religion.world1 … People have estimated the total impact outside that constraint and concluded ~117 deaths per year in USA alone: https://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_U.S._Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths … You are trying to justify forcing unnecessary surgery on kids that causes this.
-
Lol. “Estimated” data and selective sources. By your own logic, all day, these are BS. You should expect better of yourself considering the high bar you’ve established for fact and proof.
-
I cited you original research from someone who directly went through case reports to compile a fact-based evaluation of the number of deaths that occurred in the same hospital admission as the circumcision, probably took years of work, and you dismiss it with "BS". Learn to read
-
You haven't provided your own numbers because you don't have any. I'm not even debating with you if you give me nothing to debate against. I'm just educating you: This is the research that exists into the death rate from circumcision. Show me more if you have it.
-
Almost forgot, I have more still. Here's another showing that male circumcision can cause SIDS: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/07/339465 … Which helps to explain part of the reason why boys die from SIDS more than girls.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.