This isn't a contest, why can't we just oppose all the things that are wrong? Besides, everyone knows about those kids and are doing what they can. Most people don't know how fucked circumcision gets.
-
-
Like, you're right in the sense that it's okay to oppose bad things, but on the other hand calling dick skin removal a "human rights violation" is an insult to the legitimate human rights violations happening around the world to people who have the capacity to *remember* it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You might wanna choose different criteria for considering a violation "serious enough" other than whether or not they remember it. You gonna say that to everyone who's been drugged unconscious and raped? I hope not. It's not a contest. Wrong is wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Did you just compare fucking circumcision to RAPE Like For fucking real??
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It is rape: they strap down the baby, induce an erection, insert a metal probe inside the penis, use said probe to pry away the fused-to-the-glans foreskin, and then slice it off. They do all of this without consent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah that sucks. However it's not for sexual pleasure. The baby cannot comprehend 90% of the scenario. The baby has no sexual capability. Calling this rape is fucking disgusting and a disgrace to rape victims. Log off dumbfuck
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
How do you know all of the gutters don't derive sexual pleasure from it? How would you define sodomizing someone with a probe not for sexual pleasure but for humiliation or punishment? I prefer objective definitions that don't rely on assumptions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ARE YOU TELLIN ME THAT DOCTORS *JUST MIGHT* GET OFF TO CIRCUMCISION IM CHOKING BDNDBJDKSNSMNSDBDBDSNSMDNDNX
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Undoubtedly there are circumfetishist doctors out there. My argument, though, is that it doesn't matter. The end result is the same: The child's genitals were violated--induced genital stimulation, forced penetration, and physical assault.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My argument is that you don't give a shit about rape survivors because you're comparing them to infants who will never remember it. Your self-centered worldview has you believing that a crime you don't remember outweighs the trauma that millions of women face. Log off, dumbfuck
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If you have a problem with the terminology maybe take it up with this woman, the author of "The Rape of Innocence". A "circumcised" woman who recognizes male circumcision as the same kind of genital mutilation she experienced.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_QTfrLWfl6k …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.