I muted this guy but apprentally he's still spamming me because he's mad I dunked on his creepy penis posse
-
-
Like, you're right in the sense that it's okay to oppose bad things, but on the other hand calling dick skin removal a "human rights violation" is an insult to the legitimate human rights violations happening around the world to people who have the capacity to *remember* it.
-
You might wanna choose different criteria for considering a violation "serious enough" other than whether or not they remember it. You gonna say that to everyone who's been drugged unconscious and raped? I hope not. It's not a contest. Wrong is wrong.
-
Did you just compare fucking circumcision to RAPE Like For fucking real??
-
It is rape: they strap down the baby, induce an erection, insert a metal probe inside the penis, use said probe to pry away the fused-to-the-glans foreskin, and then slice it off. They do all of this without consent.
-
Yeah that sucks. However it's not for sexual pleasure. The baby cannot comprehend 90% of the scenario. The baby has no sexual capability. Calling this rape is fucking disgusting and a disgrace to rape victims. Log off dumbfuck
-
Dismissing rape because the victim cannot comprehend the situation or is personally asexual is a fallacy. I doubt you'd be so dismissive of forced penetration of cognitively challenged adults, for instance. You make excuses to protect your biased worldview.
-
The child doesn't live with trauma because of this. They are unable to comprehend the bad thing that happened to them. Also you use big words because you're insecure. You hide behind a confident Twitter persona arguing about infant dicks because you want to feel oppressed. STFU
-
I comprehend it now, asshole. I'm not a different person than the one that was violated 30 years ago, it's still me.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.