Opens profile photo
Follow
Click to Follow KhangXVu
Khang Vu
@KhangXVu
Ph.D. candidate. I study East Asian security. Korea & Vietnam watcher. MA. Hanoi made. A proud fan. 武春康.
Boston, MAlinkedin.com/in/khang-x-vu/Joined March 2019

Khang Vu’s Tweets

"China will hold a rare joint military exercise with its landlocked neighbour Laos this month." As I argued before, China's growing military influence in Laos will hurt Vietnam more than its aggression at sea. Vietnam must look west instead of east.
2
13
From me: a US security commitment to Vietnam shouldn't include just Hanoi's maritime security. The US must commit to Hanoi's continental security also for Chinese coercion won't be limited to a single domain. The US has much to learn from USSR when it comes to defending Vietnam.
Quote Tweet
What Hanoi needs from its relationship with Washington depends overwhelmingly on the state of China-Vietnam relations. buff.ly/3LzVM07
3
15
Vietnam sharing an ideology with China doesn’t mean it’s pro-China. Vietnam sharing some security interests with the US doesn’t mean it’s pro-US. Vietnam is pro-Vietnam.
14
174
I can never understand how some people can claim that Vietnam won't stand up to China because of a common ideology. 1979 proves that when necessary and as a very last resort, Vietnam would be willing to protect its national interests by all possible means against any threats.
18
146
My interview with Radio France Internationale on the US-Vietnam-China triangle. China doesn't worry about Vietnam's arms modernization because Vietnam cannot arms race with China. Instead, China worries more about Vietnam improving relations with the US.
2
45
When CN-VN relations have been bad, CN has been determined to punish VN to force its neutrality because CN viewed VN's diplomatic ties with other powers as security threats. Chinese coercion decreased number of diplomatic options available to VN and hence undermined its agency.
2
3
Show this thread
When China-Vietnam relations have been good or stable, Vietnam’s agency increased because China tolerated Hanoi’s assertion of its autonomy by increasing diplomatic ties with other extra-regional great powers. China did not see those ties as threats to its security.
1
3
Show this thread
I explained why Vietnam's growing number of partnerships don't increase its agency vis-à-vis China. CN has been the most important factor behind VN's multidirectional foreign policy because CN has the capability to constrain VN's options.
2
22
Show this thread
From me. "The US simply sees that it needs Vietnam to counterbalance China in the South China Sea. But it’s best for Vietnam to stay on good terms with China. The Vietnamese government understands that there is no way that they can win a military fight."
9
37
"The US condemned Vietnam's jailing of a prominent political activist and said ties could only reach their full potential if VN improved human rights record." The problem is VN holds the trump card in this relationship. US needs VN more than VN needs US.
9
22
Time does fly. My sister and I planned to go to Copley on that day. Fortunately, we overslept and avoided the tragedy. The police caught one of the terrorists just 4 miles away from where we lived at the time. #BostonStrong
Quote Tweet
ALERT: The starting line for the 2023 Boston Marathon is now in place for Marathon Monday! 💛💙
Image
8
While I’m optimistic about recent developments, Blinken’s visit to Vietnam is not a guarantee that both sides will upgrade bilateral ties. When Sec Def Austin and VP Harris visited in 2021, Vietnam rejected the upgrade. Process is not necessarily the same as progress.
Quote Tweet
Blinken to visit Vietnam next week, US senator says reut.rs/418FCjc
Image
5
22
And the fact that this call happened during the Summit for Democracy is even more symbolic. A coincidence or not, the US is signaling that ideological differences should not be a major obstacle in the bilateral relationship.
2
13
Show this thread
The US added "resilient" to its Vietnam policy. Instead of just supporting a "strong, prosperous, and independent Vietnam" in the past, it is now a "strong, prosperous, resilient, and independent Vietnam." Will we REALLY see an upgrade in ties then?
7
48
Show this thread
"Party General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong and President Joe Biden reiterated their invitation for high-level visits. The two leaders accepted the invitation from each other and assigned relevant agencies to arrange visits at an appropriate time."
11
Show this thread
Biden having a phone call with the General Secretary, not the President, is a wise move. The first step to upgrading US-Vietnam ties is to respect the Communist Party's authority, and the Party wants successive US presidents to affirm that principle. There are no other options.
Quote Tweet
President Joe Biden and VCP Gen Sec Nguyen Phu Trong have just had a telephone conversation this evening. Did they discuss upgrading bilateral relationship? An invite for Trong to visit US? (Biden was invited to VN last Nov) I’ll update when I have more info.
Show this thread
Image
3
58
Show this thread
Quoted in this piece by , "Vietnam reaps more benefits from a continuation of a friendly relationship with China than an upgrade in the relationship with the US, for it is China that ultimately determines the level of Vietnam’s security."
4
28
"[Leadership turnover] raises doubts about prospect of Vietnam joining any coalition led by the US ... given Trong’s view that China’s support is essential to the success of CPV." I would caution against saying a politician is either pro-US or pro-China.
3
23
Just to clarify: I don't claim that the factions do not exist. I claim that we don't have the evidence to prove that they exist. Those are two different claims. Either the factions exist or they don't. We simply don't know in the absence of primary evidence.
Quote Tweet
Are there “pro-China” or “pro-US” factions in Vietnamese politics? In this piece @Diplomat_APAC, I trace and explain the obsession with “factions” as an explanatory variable. Arguments mentioning “factions” without primary evidence are unfalsifiable. thediplomat.com/2023/03/the-an
17
Are there “pro-China” or “pro-US” factions in Vietnamese politics? In this piece , I trace and explain the obsession with “factions” as an explanatory variable. Arguments mentioning “factions” without primary evidence are unfalsifiable.
20
I have seen many takes following this line of argument with authors providing little primary source evidence to show that such a distinction between party and govt bureaucrats exists. Takes based on rumor or secondary sources aren’t falsifiable and are methodologically wrong.
2
21
Show this thread
Vietnam's UN abstention on Russian invasion is neither "right" nor "wrong," but rational. Vietnam's domestic political system values consistency in foreign policy and Hanoi only changes its stance when there is clear net benefit. My latest .
1
15
And even in the event that Vietnam supports Ukraine, its support cannot change the balance of power in Europe. Contrarily, Vietnam's support for the US Indo-Pacific strategy helps tilt regional balance of power in the US favor a bit. The US hence will not pressure VN too much.
2
16
Show this thread
And do not forget that Vietnam sees the hypocrisy behind the UN vote. The West condemned Hanoi's invasion of Cambodia to overthrow the genocidal Pol Pot regime. From Hanoi's perspective, the West has no moral high ground to condemn Vietnam for staying neutral.
4
26
Show this thread
It's too simple to say Vietnam's abstention is bad. Hanoi reaps little benefit picking a side. Standing w/ Russia hurts its ties w/ the West while standing w/ Ukraine hurts its ties w/ Russia. If VN's important enough to balancing China, it will get the support no matter what.
Image
6
56
Show this thread
As a land power bordering a body of water, Vietnam has historically prioritized land threats. An in-depth study of its history suggests that whether Vietnam realizes it or not, it has always had a continental grand strategy. My latest
1
20