One of the deepest questions I know: why don't species designs rot, and require eventual replacement from scratch, remotely as much as do individual organisms, or as do human-made software systems and complex product designs?
-
2. There’s little selection pressure to stay healthy/whole long past expected lifespan. 3. In contrast, there is selection pressure to “live fast/die young,” and trade off the future for present reproductive success.
Interesting that this argument doesn’t apply to species. I guess maybe it applies to human-engineered systems, kinda?
-
-
Do you know of any examples off the top of your head? Linux maybe?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would it be *expected* to apply to species?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.