The title suggests a cheeky approach, as if it were written for an aspiring dictator. This is misleading. The book is actually a work of straightforward political science (both theoretical and empirical). Maybe not as fun, but still very enlightening.
-
-
The book also has a VERY cynical take on foreign aid (esp. disaster relief) intended to help citizens of autocratic governments: (1) Autocrats take most of the $ for themselves; (2) Knowing aid $ will come creates a perverse incentive not to prevent disasters ahead of time.
Show this thread -
Savvy governments (e.g., the US State Department) understand that aid money mostly goes to the dictator and his coalition, which is why they use it for bribes (i.e., to extract policy concessions), all in the guise of "helping the poor."
Show this thread -
But finally (on an optimistic note), the book portrays democracies as relatively stable arrangements(!), stuck in a kind of virtuous cycle where both citizens AND leaders benefit from key political freedoms.
Show this thread -
Why key political freedoms (speech, press, assembly) are mostly stable in a democracy: 1. Politicians who provide freedoms make voters happy ⇒ re-elected. 2. Politicians need free speech to know what voters actually want. 3. Free people work harder and smarter ⇒ ↑ tax revenue.
Show this thread -
P.S.
@cgpgrey made a fantastic 18-minute video summary of The Dictator's Handbook: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs …. Also a bonus follow-up video on Death and Dynasties (5 min): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ig_qpNfXHIU … These videos are no substitute for the full book, but they're pretty damn good.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
.) Otherwise the leader will be swapped out for someone more effective.
(esp. the chapter on politics).
Now some quotes and takeaways...