no, subtweeting ppl who don't realize that there's a tradeoff! (or don't acknowledge it.)
All norm enforcement regimes, formal and informal, face an inevitable tradeoff between false negatives and false positives.
-
-
-
Not who I was originally subtweeting, but this is a good example of a discussion where people (i.e., Tapper) don’t acknowledge the tradeoffpic.twitter.com/rSYNgWM6BY
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What kinds of innovations improve the terms of the tradeoff? And how would you distinguish them from innovations that simply move along an existing tradeoff?
-
Unfortunately in this case you don't usually have the true underlying data to compare against. But there are people who have been executed later proved innocent, and presumably people acquitted with later evidence implying guilt.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That's a surprisingly specific comment, given that *any* categorization process faces that same trade-off...
-
Some people (I’m subtweeting pretty deep here) don’t acknowledge this particular tradeoff.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Things get interesting when one tries to push the Pareto frontier of those. Often achieved by ad hoc flexibility of the agents implementing the policies
-
Or when structural changes refactor them!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have been experimenting with what I think the model of this is. Also think it's example of both decreasing frictions effects and implicit
-
Vs explicit consensus mechanisms. Which have lots of related topics and interesting takeaways
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.