@KevinSimler blog prompt: in large hierarchy are there qualitative diffs as you 'scale' from dominance/prestige "startup" to "billionaire"?
-
-
Replying to @vgr @KevinSimler
ie is status payoff for being in the status-1% of a 7 billion person pyramid (earth) diff from 300 mill (US), 6m (bay area) etc
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
What are your thoughts? My sense is that yes, there are qualitative differences — mostly continuous, w/ a phase change here and there.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @vgr
For example, being the "it girl" of the moment seems qualitatively different even from being a major A-list celebrity.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler @vgr
Another one probably comes from being recognized on the street by strangers who then approach you.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler @vgr
None of these "phase changes" seem inherent to the status game, though, but rather exist due to features of the environment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler @vgr
E.g., only so many people can achieve global brand recognition, there are only so many magazine covers in any one week, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinSimler
I'm interested in changes in psyche induced by the changes in environment at higher altitudes of status pyramid
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
One change might be the recognition that more of your actions are being watched. (These are all continuous vars though...)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Everything you say is "on the record" (or potentially so), since anyone could quote you and have an eager audience.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.