probably, also some pretty strong hormonal and pheremonal/etc attachment as well
-
-
Replying to @cwage
that stuff is powerful but I've been reading anthropology and it turns out to be sort of less reliable than you'd think
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
if it worked for an unbroken line of my ancestors, it's reliable enough for me :)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @cwage
sure, but part of the explanation is (apparently) that the hormonal stuff kicks in better in humans when mother
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
has positive assessment of baby's prospects (and her prospects of having help), as compared to other great apes
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
so if you want bonding to keep working as well in the future as it did in the past, that's crucial.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
oh, that's fascinating (and kind of scary). Any quick links to read more?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinSimler @cwage
been reading books of Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, will try to find you something linkable later if this 5-month-old allows ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
(actual/perceived lack of support is the best explanation of post-partum depression too, IMO -not hormonal probs in mom)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @amelapay @KevinSimler
Hrdy also sorta critical of Machiavellian Int hypothesis fwiw (I started reading EITB draft in Jan but got derailed by birth!)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
oh, interesting. Is her position compelling?
-
-
Replying to @KevinSimler
iff her facts are correct, which I'm not in an excellent position to judge, admittedly. this is on top of my long to-blog list!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.