I was asked why Bayesianism is not an epistemology and what is alternative. Answers in http://meaningness.com/probability-and-logic … & http://meaningness.com/metablog/how-to-think … …
-
Well, Bayesianism, trivial as it is, has a lot more apparatus than “keep/discard.”
I don't mean that Bayesianism is encoded in trial-and-error, only that it can (and did) arise from such a process.
-
-
Let’s say, for the sake of the argument, that every discovery can be retrospectively described as a keep/discard process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyhoo, I'm gonna chalk this up, once again, to my inability to productively discuss epistemology on Twitter. Carry on :)
-
Yes, this probably would need greater bandwidth! Maybe on another occasion, in another venue :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.