I was asked why Bayesianism is not an epistemology and what is alternative. Answers in http://meaningness.com/probability-and-logic … & http://meaningness.com/metablog/how-to-think … …
It may not match scientists' day-to-day practice, but it matches science at some level of description (the relevant lvl, IMO).
-
-
I guess that depends in part on what your goals are. There is “why should we believe Science?” which Popper addresses, >
-
> and his story is probably pretty good for justifying Science to lay people.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.