I was asked why Bayesianism is not an epistemology and what is alternative. Answers in http://meaningness.com/probability-and-logic … & http://meaningness.com/metablog/how-to-think … …
Maybe it is too reductionist, i.e., not even addressing the same concerns as Bayesianism/etc.
-
-
I don’t think it’s too reductionist, just that by itself it doesn’t explain anything. What do you try, how do you decide k/d?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.